How skipping differs from pausing
A pause can suggest a broader temporary halt, while skipping is narrower: it is about passing on one scheduled cycle. Both tools reduce friction, but they support different donor intentions.
Skipping a cycle is different from canceling the product. It gives the donor breathing room without requiring a full disconnect or account closure.
A pause can suggest a broader temporary halt, while skipping is narrower: it is about passing on one scheduled cycle. Both tools reduce friction, but they support different donor intentions.
Donors do not always want a binary choice between 'stay on forever' and 'close everything.' A skip control is a practical middle ground when spending or cash flow looks unusual for a specific week.
It does not revise already processed cycles or unwind a withdrawal already in progress. Like other control features, its effect is forward-looking once exercised before the cutoff.
No. Skipping is a temporary control for a specific cycle, while cancellation ends participation prospectively.
Yes. That is exactly the kind of real-life cash-flow reason a skip feature is helpful for.
The applicable processing cutoff is shown in the service.